Article 3 & Article 8 ECHR Medical Claims Post AM Zimbabwe and Paposhvili
AM (Zimbabwe) , affirmed the Article 3 medical threshold as that held in Paposhvili v Belgium and provided the Supreme Court’s interpretative steer which is now the test to follow when considering medical claims (Article 3).
There are two elements to determining an Article 3 medical claim:
- The substantive test; and
- The procedural obligations
These 2 elements are interlinked and must both be addressed in the evidence and legal submissions when making a claim that removal would be a breach of Article 3 on medical grounds.
This webinar will analyse the case law and the distinction between making an Article 8 and Article 3 claim. Consideration will also be given to the types of submissions and evidence required for a successful claim, making it ideal for practitioners who would like to improve this area of their immigration practice.
What You Will Learn
This webinar will cover the following:
- The background to AM and Paposhvili
- Further case law to reply upon
- The lower threshold for child medical cases
- Practical guidance on how to make a successful medical claim
This pre-recorded webinar will be streamed at 12:30pm on Monday 20th September 2021 and will remain available to view by delegates who have registered by then for 90 days.
at your organisation