The 6 Methods of Delay Analysis in Construction Projects

Introduction

Delay analysis remains one of the most critical aspects of construction disputes. While there are 6 recognised methodologies, recent case law has reinforced that success in practice depends less on the label of the method used and more on how well the analysis aligns with the factual record.

This webinar moves beyond a theoretical overview of delay analysis methods and focuses on how they perform in real disputes. Drawing on recent and past technology and construction court decisions, the session explores what courts and tribunals actually find persuasive and where analyses can fail.

You will gain practical insight into how different approaches operate in practice, the risks associated with each method and how to select and apply a methodology that is robust, transparent and defensible. The webinar will also explore common pitfalls seen in expert evidence and provide practical guidance to improve the reliability of delay analyses in both live projects and dispute contexts.

What You Will Learn

This webinar will cover the following:

• The key delay analysis methodologies and how they differ in practice
• How to select an appropriate method depending on project stage, available data and purpose
• Why courts and tribunals do not ‘prefer’ one method, but focus on substance and reliability
• Common pitfalls in delay analysis, including misapplication and over-reliance on assumptions
• The importance of contemporaneous records, critical path analysis and logical reasoning
• Lessons from recent case law, including how expert evidence is assessed and challenged
• How to ensure your analysis can withstand scrutiny, including addressing the ‘but for’ question
• Practical tips to improve clarity, transparency and defensibility in delay analysis